On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Bill Allombert wrote: > But as a technical document, it is lacking practical recommendation > for maintainers how to make sure their package build reproducibly
The practical recommendations for maintainers are encoded separately, as they're evolving. See https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto for example. > and create confusion on the goal by using the term 'reproducible > build' when 'robust build' is meant (which is a worthwile goal by > itself, but a different project nevertheless). I'm not convinced that this change will reduce confusion, as the reproducible build project has been using this language in Debian for many years now. But I could be wrong. Please propose an alternative patch to policy which addresses your concerns if you feel strongly about it. -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com Maybe I did steal your heart and I am such a perfect criminal that you never noticed -- a softer world #481 http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=481