On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:19:47PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Bill Allombert wrote: > > But as a technical document, it is lacking practical recommendation > > for maintainers how to make sure their package build reproducibly > > The practical recommendations for maintainers are encoded separately, as > they're evolving. See https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto > for example.
> > and create confusion on the goal by using the term 'reproducible > > build' when 'robust build' is meant (which is a worthwile goal by > > itself, but a different project nevertheless). > > I'm not convinced that this change will reduce confusion, as the > reproducible build project has been using this language in Debian for > many years now. It is apparent that the reproducible build project has broadened their focus following the progress they made, which is logical. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.