- What parameters have you used with gbp to successfully build from sources? - your repo is behind sid: debian/2.4+dfsg1-3 vs debian/2.4+dfsg1-4
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Ludovico Cavedon <ludovico.cave...@gmail.com > wrote: > package ntopng > tags 857060 + unreproducible > thanks > > Hi Jean-Christophe, > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:36 PM jean-christophe manciot < > actionmysti...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> [...] >> > dpkg-source: info: applying log-filename.patch >> dpkg-source: info: applying no-librt.patch >> dpkg-source: info: applying use-system-ndpi.patch >> > [...] >> dpkg-source: info: building ntopng using existing >> ./ntopng_2.4+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz >> patching file configure.seed >> Hunk #1 FAILED at 231. >> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED >> dpkg-source: info: the patch has fuzz which is not allowed, or is >> malformed >> dpkg-source: info: if patch 'no-librt.patch' is correctly applied by >> quilt, use 'quilt refresh' to update it >> >> > I was unable to reproduce this issue, even with a clean clone of the repo > and resetting master to the debian/2.4+dfsg1-2 tag. > Maybe some had gone wrong with the creation of > ntopng_2.4+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz? Maybe because of https://bugs.debian.org/ > 857590? > > Thanks, > Ludovico > > -- Jean-Christophe
