On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:23 PM jean-christophe manciot < actionmysti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > - What parameters have you used with gbp to successfully build from > sources? > > gbp buildpackage --git-verbose --git-pristine-tar > > - your repo is behind sid: debian/2.4+dfsg1-3 vs debian/2.4+dfsg1-4 > > Ah, sorry, the tag was missing. Added. Thanks, Ludovico > > On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Ludovico Cavedon < > ludovico.cave...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> package ntopng >> tags 857060 + unreproducible >> thanks >> >> Hi Jean-Christophe, >> >> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:36 PM jean-christophe manciot < >> actionmysti...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> [...] >>> >> dpkg-source: info: applying log-filename.patch >>> dpkg-source: info: applying no-librt.patch >>> dpkg-source: info: applying use-system-ndpi.patch >>> >> [...] >>> dpkg-source: info: building ntopng using existing >>> ./ntopng_2.4+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz >>> patching file configure.seed >>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 231. >>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED >>> dpkg-source: info: the patch has fuzz which is not allowed, or is >>> malformed >>> dpkg-source: info: if patch 'no-librt.patch' is correctly applied by >>> quilt, use 'quilt refresh' to update it >>> >>> >> I was unable to reproduce this issue, even with a clean clone of the repo >> and resetting master to the debian/2.4+dfsg1-2 tag. >> Maybe some had gone wrong with the creation of >> ntopng_2.4+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz? Maybe because of >> https://bugs.debian.org/857590? >> >> Thanks, >> Ludovico >> >> > > > -- > Jean-Christophe >
