severity 876521 serious thanks On 12.11.2017 22:20, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > You shouldn't have waited for this issue to request the transition slot. > As I said before, I'll remove the SFCGAL dependency from PostGIS if this > issue is not resolved when the CGAL transition starts. That way we can > keep postgis is testing.
Don't worry, sfcgal was not the only reverse dependency that needs more than a binNMU. > Just raise the severity of this issue to serious when the transition > starts. That's the usual procedure for blocking issues and transitions. [0] The transition just started. Done. Best regards, Joachim