Il 10/12/2017 21:16, Samuel Thibault ha scritto: > Hello, > > Paolo Greppi, on lun. 04 déc. 2017 18:24:46 +0100, wrote: >> P.S. IMHO it would make sense to separate the libttspico-utils binary >> package from the svox source package. >> In this way it would have its own version number, plus the code would not be >> in a patch >> but in plaintext. > > Indeed, it makes a lot of sense, it "just needs" to be done, any taker ? :) > (it means: submitting the ITP, setting up a repo on alioth for the > debian packaging, writing the packaging bits, and upload. I can quickly > do the last step if all the previous steps are done). > > Samuel
I can do the ITP and the packaging. I propose to name the new source pico2wave. It would produce a new binary pico2wave and a transitional libttspico-utils as per: https://wiki.debian.org/RenamingPackages Re. the repo on alioth, as a DM I can not write in git.debian.org:/git/collab-maint so somebody should create the pico2wave.git directory in there and assign the owner to paolog-guest. Or we place the repo somewhere else. Paolo
