Hi Nicholas, Thanks for following up on this and for taking over maintenance of muse-el.
Yes, I still use muse and yes, it would still be desirable to have the documentation available as debian package. Leo Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com> writes: > Control: severity -1 wishlist > > Hi Leo, > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:14:20PM +0000, Leo Butler wrote: >> Package: muse-el >> Version: 3.20-2 >> >> The info file, located in texi/muse.info of the Muse source, is not >> included in the Debian package. If this cannot be included in the >> muse-el package due to licensing conflicts, then perhaps it could be put >> into a separate documentation package. >> > > I adopted maintenance of muse-el sometime last year, and sorry for the > delay following up on this bug. I've marked it as wishlist because > new packages are wishlist priority. > > You're right, texi/muse.info is GFDL with invariants, thus is not > DFSG-free, and providing it would require a muse-doc package in the > non-free section. I haven't yet investigated what the best way to > maintain a single file orig.tarball. > > Please let me know if you're still interested in this package. > > Sincerely, > Nicholas