Hi, Given my past collaboration with the original authors, I believe this is an oversight! I'll see what I can do.
Also I wish you wouldn't start mentioning package removal/replacement on first contact, this is inconsiderate. Regards. On 02/03/2018 04:19, Julie Marchant wrote: > Package: ballz-data > Version: 1.0.3-1 > > I have investigated the GitLab repository of B.A.L.L.Z. (packages: > ballz, ballz-data) and found that the license of the ballz-data package > is incorrectly indicated. The GitLab repository is here: > > https://gitlab.com/ballz/ballz/ > > And the COPYING file states the following: > > "All source under the src directory is licensed under the BSD license except > the source under the src/dumb directory which is licensed under the Dumb > license." > > As you can see, the license notice is specifically for the source code, > *not* the data. No license is given for the data. As such, ballz-data > should be moved to non-free, and ballz should be moved to contrib, > unless one of the following is done: > > 1. The author of the game is contacted, requested to provide a license > for the data, and does so; or > > 2. Someone replaces everything in ballz-data with a DFSG version. >
