Given my past collaboration with the original authors, I believe this is
an oversight!
I'll see what I can do.

Also I wish you wouldn't start mentioning package removal/replacement on
first contact, this is inconsiderate.


On 02/03/2018 04:19, Julie Marchant wrote:
> Package: ballz-data
> Version: 1.0.3-1
> I have investigated the GitLab repository of B.A.L.L.Z. (packages:
> ballz, ballz-data) and found that the license of the ballz-data package
> is incorrectly indicated. The GitLab repository is here:
> https://gitlab.com/ballz/ballz/
> And the COPYING file states the following:
> "All source under the src directory is licensed under the BSD license except
> the source under the src/dumb directory which is licensed under the Dumb
> license."
> As you can see, the license notice is specifically for the source code,
> *not* the data. No license is given for the data. As such, ballz-data
> should be moved to non-free, and ballz should be moved to contrib,
> unless one of the following is done:
> 1. The author of the game is contacted, requested to provide a license
> for the data, and does so; or
> 2. Someone replaces everything in ballz-data with a DFSG version.

Reply via email to