On 22.03.2018 11:52, Andreas Tille wrote: >> Reading the packages from UDD would follow then (taking the SQL >> statements from the GSOC approach) by implementing an "apt.Cache" like >> package repository that is built from UDD. > > I do not mind much about the actual implementation. If this "apt.Cache" > like will be able to reflect dependency of architecture.
apt.Cache is already able to work with multiple archs if they are enabled with dpkg. >> The structure of the package is a bit more complicated than just for >> To get the documentation, do a `make html` in the doc subdir (needs >> sphinx installed). > > I think that's just the code documentation not the general Blends > documentation which is currently in the same source package as > blends-dev, right? Yes. > PS: Do you plan to also implement the dependency_data statistics? I am not aware of this, and since my time is a bit limited: Not in the moment. Best Ole