On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:15:44PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > > > > I do not mind much about the actual implementation. If this "apt.Cache" > > like will be able to reflect dependency of architecture. > > apt.Cache is already able to work with multiple archs if they are > enabled with dpkg.
Good. > >> The structure of the package is a bit more complicated than just for > >> To get the documentation, do a `make html` in the doc subdir (needs > >> sphinx installed). > > > > I think that's just the code documentation not the general Blends > > documentation which is currently in the same source package as > > blends-dev, right? > > Yes. It might make sense to split blends-doc into a separate source package since it is not really connected to blends-dev. What do you think? > > PS: Do you plan to also implement the dependency_data statistics? > > I am not aware of this, and since my time is a bit limited: Not in the > moment. OK. May be I'll check that once we are settled with the main functionality. I rely a bit on this since I'm creating graphs[1] about the development of the Blend from it. But I can reimplement this probably once we have settled with the rewrite. Please let me know if something is ready for testing. Thanks for your work on this Andreas. [1] https://people.debian.org/~tille/talks/20180210_debian-med-sprint/debian-med_3_1.pdf -- http://fam-tille.de