Control: fixed -1 1.0~beta20-1 Hi,
I just checked and this was fixed by my upload of v1.0~beta20-1, ... which I did because I ran into the same bug while packaging something else ;) However, ocaml-rope now FTBFS due to dh_missing; I will file a bug and fix that momentarily. Best, nicoo On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 11:58:01PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Control: reassign -1 jbuilder 1.0~beta19-1 > Control: affects -1 src:ocaml-rope src:ocaml-migrate-parsetree > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:23:01PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 08:13:56PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:08:52PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 06:15:11PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > Source: ocaml-rope > > > > > Version: 0.6-1 > > > > > Severity: serious > > > > > > > > > > Some recent change in unstable makes ocaml-rope FTBFS: > > > > > > > > > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/ocaml-rope.html > > > > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/ocaml-rope.html > > > > > > > > This rather looks like bug #881770 of jbuilder, which was supposed to be > > > > fixed in jbuilder (1.0~beta18-1), except that recent versions of > > > > jbuilder > > > > fail to compile at all on byte-code architectures. > > > > > > amd64 and arm64 are not byte-code architectures. > > > > You are right. I was looking at the autobuilder status which only > > displays build-failures on bytecode arches at the moment. > > I just tried with jbuilder 1.0~beta14-1, > and that fixed the build. > > Likely related beta14 -> beta19 breakage in ocaml-migrate-parsetree: > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/ocaml-migrate-parsetree.html > > > -Ralf. > > cu > Adrian > > -- > > "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out > of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. > "Only a promise," Lao Er said. > Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed > >
