On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 17:03:34 +0200 Petter Reinholdtsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> [Chris Dos]
> > If this patch gets applied,
> 
> I believe the point Aron is trying to get through to those of you who
> care about init.d scripts, is that you should work with the upstream
> project to get the scripts included there, to avoid having the Debian
> packages deviate from upstream any more.
> 
> In other words, you are barking up the wrong tree.  Try the upstream
> tree, it might work better.

I think you may be confused here. The scripts have been upstream for years. In 
fact for many years they were the *only* upstream init scripts. 
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/tree/master/etc/init.d has them, last 
modified 2 years - 3 months ago. That is upstream. They were successfully 
shipped in the upstream debian packages until debian finally accepted a native 
package. We have been trying to get the sysv scripts added back in since then. 
The patch from Chris Dos does not add any init scripts, it only has them 
installed to the debian package and changes the location of 2 binaries to where 
debian put them. His patch only adds 30 lines to the debian build scripts 
almost all in debian/rules. How exactly do we bark this up upstream's tree?


-chris zubrzycki
- --
PGP ID: 0xA2ABC070
Fingerprint: 26B0 BA6B A409 FA83 42B3  1688 FBF9 8232 A2AB C070
========================================================

Unix  _IS_  user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are.

Reply via email to