On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 19:37 +0000, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> * Package name : build-alternative
> Version : 0.0.1
> Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov <kact...@debian.org>
> * Url : https://salsa.debian.org/kaction/build-alternati
> ve
>
How well tested is the package? From a quick look at the Debianization:
<quote>
Package: build-alternative
Architecture: all
Depends:
${misc:Depends},
dietlibc-dev (>= 0.34~cvs20160606-3) [alpha amd64 arm64 armeb armel armhf hppa
i386 mips mipsel mips64el powerpc powerpcspe ppc64 ppc64el s390x sparc64 x32],
</quote>
That combination is explicitly forbidden by Policy, and will not
produce a useful result. (See https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
ch-relationships.html#syntax-of-relationship-fields , specifically the
paragraph beginning "[f]or binary relationship fields".)
Regards,
Adam
