On 22.02.19 12:44, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > [2019-02-21 00:00] Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> >> On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 19:37:38 +0000, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: >>> Package: wnpp >>> Severity: wishlist >>> Owner: Dmitry Bogatov <kact...@debian.org> >>> >>> * Package name : build-alternative >>> Version : 0.0.1 >>> Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov <kact...@debian.org> >>> * Url : https://salsa.debian.org/kaction/build-alternative >>> * Licenses : GPL-3+ >>> Programming Lang : shell >>> Section : devel >>> >>> This package provide makefile snippet, that abstract away >>> several issues, related to building package with diet libc. >>> . >>> * diet libc is not supported on every Debian architecture >>> * code to check for build profiles is repetive >>> . >>> Regular users do not need to install this package, it is only >>> useful to Debian Contributors. >> >> Hmm this package name looks extremely generic for what it is described >> to be used for. Could you name it something else that includes either >> dietlibc in its name or at least libc or similar? > > I do not exclude, that it may include support for musl for future. I am > not sure, whether overly generic name now is worse then misleading > source package name in future.
then it's maybe premature to upload that package at all? Anyway, build-alternative is way too generic.