On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 02:27:51PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote: > Mattia, just to gauge your opinion, what would you hypothethically say > to a "P:" check for this and, separately, the current "I:" autopkgtest > check?
I only say that, out of 24 packages listed in my ddpo, 4 already have gitlab-ci enabled to run their own tests (and they are all native or pseudo-native packages). Of the remaining perhaps only 1 or 2 more packages would make sense to have a CI for, but I have no interest whatsoever to test the remaining at every commit, and for quite a few of them it wouldn't even make sense since they lack a testsuite (and no, I don't think test-building the whole package every commit is useful, the only case where I find a full test build useful is when that is run on architectures I don't usually use, which is not the case here; also, for that we have the buildds). So, an hypothetical P check for a .gitlab-ci.yml file would just be another check that ends up in my ignore list… -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature