On 2019-10-31 Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 06:54:15PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >> Would you mind explaning (or giving a pointer) why you would prefer this >> over using the "noguile" profile?
> I'm not opposed to profiles in principle. Indeed, I'm likely one of the > major profile users. There are two reasons for not (over)using them: [...] > This also means that I don't mind adding a noguile profile. It just > means that I prefer not to use it if avoidable. Hello Helmut, thanks for fleshing this out. This was not the fine point I had been was trying to ask about, though. ;-) - I was wondering why you suggested using a gnutls specific profile ("pkg.gnutls28.noguile") while the BuildProfileSpec lists "noguile" as registered profile name. [...] >> I have no strong preference, but /fixing/ generally seems to be a better >> way than disabling selectively. > Ok, let's try that first if you (or someone else) have any other ideas. As a hotfix I plan to upload with noguile profile support (unless you prefer "pkg.gnutls28.noguile"?) after -3 has migrated to testing. It cannot hurt to keep this report open for a little bit of time, perhaps we find a real solution. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'