Hi, If anyone wants to take over I'm more than fine with that. The amount of work I have at the moment barely permits me from maintaining projects. It's most sensible that someone actively using this project on Debian maintains it, as is, I'm not using it much anymore and am not working in HPC at the moment. The bug should definitely reported upstream. Upgrading the package should be fairly simple though - the dependencies are already in place, as are simple tests/git integration etc.: https://github.com/azet/lmod-deb
Thanks, Aaron > On 15.09.2020, at 09:33, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> wrote: > > retitle 951508 lmod: broken on all architectures except x86_64 (wrong search > path) > severity 951508 serious > thanks > > Hi, > > We ran into the same bug on an arm64 system, so it looks like lmod is > broken on all architectures except x86_64. I'm updating the bug title > and the severity to reflect that. > > I'm attaching the diffoscope output that shows that the generated > packages are indeed different on amd64 and arm64. > > A simple fix would be to turn this package into an Architecture:any > package. But indeed, it should probably be reported (and fixed) upstream. > >> On 17/02/20 at 19:49 +0100, Aaron Zauner wrote: >> Since I'm barely keeping this package updated I'd suggest that you use the >> upstream Lmod project source with the dependencies that come with this >> package, you'll get more bug fixes, Performance and features out of it in a >> production environment. That's what we used to do on live HPC systems since >> a lot of software needs to be built by hand outside of the distro packaging >> anyway. > > Err, if this is the case, maybe you should mark this package as orphaned > or RFA? I'm also Ccing people who uploaded NMUs for the package. Maybe > someone is interested in taking over. > > Lucas > <lmod-diffoscope.txt>
