On 10/15/20 6:58 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Bash maintainers, > >> Bash is one of the few remaining packages in the 'Essential' package >> set that remains unreproducible, and this patch has been in the BTS >> for over a year now. > > So, there are now only two packages in the Essential set that are > unreproducible. I plan to work on the other package (Perl) shortly, > but having Bash fixed in the archive itself would be very welcome > and motivating withal.
really? No libgcc in the essential set? yes, it would be motivating if you would address the GCC issues upstream and not keeping a set of local patches.
