Hi Matthias Klose, > >> Bash is one of the few remaining packages in the 'Essential' package > >> set that remains unreproducible, and this patch has been in the BTS > >> for over a year now. > > > > So, there are now only two packages in the Essential set that are > > unreproducible. I plan to work on the other package (Perl) shortly, > > but having Bash fixed in the archive itself would be very welcome > > and motivating withal. > > really? No libgcc in the essential set? yes, it would be motivating if you > would address the GCC issues upstream and not keeping a set of local patches.
Unfortunately I don't understand the hostility of this reply or how it is relevant to Bash. Perhaps we are talking at cross-purposes. I am using this page: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/pkg_set_essential.html … which does not list GCC. I was also not aware that I was keeping a set of local patches. However, thank you for resolving this bug in your latest upload; really really appreciated. Kind regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` [email protected] 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk `-
