On 19 November 2020 at 19:07, Andreas Tille wrote: | Control: tags 972074 pending | Control: block 972074 by 963392 | | On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 07:53:06AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | | > | I do not have the slightest idea what this might mean. | > | > ABI/API slippage in the stack. An interface changed but a package didn't recompile. | | It seems it is caused by r-cran-rstanarm which in turn has a test | suite issue itself:
[...] | > CRAN Package Check Results for Package bayestestR | > Last updated on 2020-11-19 13:50:51 CET. | > | > Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags | > r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 0.7.5 12.67 406.54 419.21 OK | > r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 0.7.5 8.37 295.67 304.04 OK | > r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 0.7.5 498.86 OK | > r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 0.7.5 487.49 OK | > r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.7.5 16.00 636.00 652.00 OK | > r-patched-linux-x86_64 0.7.5 12.72 388.61 401.33 OK | > r-patched-solaris-x86 0.7.5 725.40 OK | > r-release-linux-x86_64 0.7.5 12.04 390.98 403.02 OK | > r-release-macos-x86_64 0.7.5 OK | > r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.7.5 13.00 652.00 665.00 OK | > r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 0.7.5 OK | > r-oldrel-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.7.5 11.00 500.00 511.00 OK | | Not sure what information this table should provide to us. The fact It makes it fairly obvious that you should not contact upstream -- because there is no issue in the upstream code. | that things are running on those other systems is great but does not | answer why it is not running for us. Exactly. It's most-likely a self-inflicted wound. FWIW I see that myself too when I do reverse depenency tests for Rcpp or related packages. rstanarm is a complicated package. You could consider not installing it for the autopkgtests for this package. Dirk -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
