On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:49:38PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> And I tried changing the second "-lib" entry to ruby-lib (it does not
> mean anything, this is a random example)
> 
> and I get the same offending term: ruby lib^@ruby-lib
> attaching the output, for ref
> 
> So it looks like more than one entry in "require_paths" outputs a
> "binary" gemspec which is troublesome.
> 
> Nilesh

This sounds like a bug in rubygems itself.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to