Hi Adrian, On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 12:00:07PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: >[…] > > The missing dependency alone is already an RC bug, > correcting the severity back to RC. > > > It would be a pity to not have it shipped in bullseye. > > It would be a pity if noone bothers enough to get this package > in a shape so that it can get shipped in bullseye. I agree and already contacted the maintainer a few hours ago in private if he is interested in co-maintaining it. Upstream has become more active in recent years and I already set up an up-to-date repo for packaging locally.
> Unfortunately the bug report mixes what looks like two different issues: > 1. The missing dependency is clearly RC and fixable by any DD. I can do that, not today anymore, but within a few days. > 2. Is the default setup after package installation with inetd working > for you? I replaced tftpd-hpa a few days ago on a server with buster and later the last week I used it on my bullseye desktop for experiments with di-netboot-assistant. I did not pay special attention when installing, but it works using rlinetd here. Best regards, Andi
