On 2022-04-20 15:27:16 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 20.04.2022 15:16, Michael Tokarev wrote: > > > A possible cause might be that unbound is confused by the old status > > > of this script (i.e. if it was set to be executable in the past) > > > during the copy of the package maintainer's version. > > This is exactly what dpkg does: it preserves local permission > changes for conffilies, even if you tell it to replace your locally- > modified conffile with a new conffile coming from the updated > package.
Where is this documented (in the case a new conffile is installed)? -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
