Ansgar, On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Ansgar wrote: > On Wed, 2022-08-03 at 09:27 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 10:11:29AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > > > > No, that would be a bad idea since systemd already ships its own, > > > preferred implementation. > > > > Is there a difference between the built-in and standalone > > implementation other than the packaging? > > Yes, executable size for example. > > A reasonable alternative to include container user needs better might > be to require init systems to provide tmpfiles (i.e., depend on a > implementation) and packages to not depend on it if they only use > tmpfiles if required for service startup via the system service > manager. (I'm not sure if tmpfiles are always used this way.)
This seems an interesting idea. I wonder if it could be handled in the init metapackage from src:init-script-helpers? Mark
