* Marc Haber:

> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 12:47:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Marc Haber:
>> > please flexibilize the output format. The current options are fine,
>> > but it would be nice to have more fine-grained control over output
>> > format. The current formats could be mapped into combination of output
>> > "atoms", with the current definitions being defaults. That way, a
>> > local admin could define their own formats.
>> 
>> Would XML output be acceptable?  Based on that, you could use various
>> other tools to transform the output to the format you need.
>
> For me, it would be unuseable, since I have not yet found the time to
> grok the "various other tools" yet.

You should investigate xmlstarlet.  For non-trivial tasks, cDuce seems
to be a useful alternative to XSLT.

> But it certainly is a modern and buzzword compliant way to output
> data in a machine-readable flexible way.

If you describe the syntax and semantics of a simpler scheme than XML
which serves your purposes better, I might implement it.  Designing
the template language is the hard part, though, and it looks way
overkill.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to