On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 01:36:50PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 05:54:23PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Or would it be easier to re-use normal dependency resolving, like: > > Kernel-Provides: linux (>> 6.6.1~), linux (<< 6.6.1.) > > This would allow full flexibility and re-uses existing code to check > > such definitions. > > Okay, noone complained, so it looks like this should work. >
No no it doesn't. Did nobody read my email? Did I even send my email? I don't know what the hell is going on here, but I spend an hour writing an email discussing the options outlined before this ridiculousness and the requirements, but I can't find it in my notmuch. -- debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev ubuntu core developer i speak de, en
