Cc'ing Reportbug Maintainers. On 2023-11-14 14:51:18 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Going back to what reportbug says, it still outputs > > [...] > Getting status for linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64... > Verifying package integrity... > Checking for newer versions at madison and > https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > > Your version (6.1.55-1) of linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64 appears to be out of > date. > The following newer release(s) are available in the Debian archive: > bullseye-backports (backports-policy): 6.1.55+1~bpo11+1 > Please try to verify if the bug you are about to report is already addressed > by these releases. Do you still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]? > > So I've looked at https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html with Firefox > and "linux-image" doesn't appear anywhere. So the information comes > from madison. > > $ apt-cache madison linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64 > linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64 | 6.1.55-1 | https://ftp.debian.org/debian > stable/main amd64 Packages > linux-signed-amd64 | 6.1.55+1 | https://ftp.debian.org/debian stable/main > Sources > > No mentions of 6.1.55+1~bpo11+1, so this is more and more confusing.
After removing bullseye-backports from my sources lists and doing "apt update", I've tried strace -o str.out -f -s 999999 reportbug linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64 but in the strace output, the string "bpo11" appears in 2 places only: [...] manpages-de (<< 4.17.0-2~bpo11+1), manpages-fr (<< 4.17.0-2~bpo11+1) [...] (thus unrelated to this issue) and in the message 193537 write(1, " bullseye-backports (backports-policy): 6.1.55+1~bpo11+1\n", 58) = 58 So I'm wondering where this information comes from. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[email protected]> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
