Hi Nis, On 2023-11-16 17:31:13 +0100, Nis Martensen wrote: > On 14.11.2023 15.17, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > >> Checking for newer versions at madison and > >> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > >> > >> Your version (6.1.55-1) of linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64 appears to be out of > >> date. > >> The following newer release(s) are available in the Debian archive: > >> bullseye-backports (backports-policy): 6.1.55+1~bpo11+1 > > > So I'm wondering where this information comes from. > > I can find "6.1.55+1~bpo11+1" in https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.822 > so it must come from there.
Thanks. I had first looked at https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html (as output by reportbug), and it doesn't appear on this page (I searched for both "linux" and "6.1.55"). Note that clicking on "Click to toggle all/binary-NEW packages" does not make this kernel appear either. FYI, I later looked at https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.822 too (as I could see it in the strace output), but only searched for linux-image there, explaining that I didn't find it either (it actually appears as linux-signed-amd64). At the bottom of the new.html page: "You can also look at the RFC822 version." But why are the contents different? (linux-signed-amd64 appears only in the RFC822 version.) -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
