Quoting Matthias Geiger (2025-11-08 18:04:07) > On Sat, 08 Nov 2025 16:33, Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> wrote: > >Version: 0.9.2-2 > > > >A belated thanks to everyone involved in this bugreport. > > > >I accidentally missed to adopt the NMU and fixed it properly by > >patching away the upstream-declared build flag which, I agree with Paul, > >is wrong to use in Debian context. > > > Do you agree that doctests should be disabled by default by our tooling > (even if different)?
Frankly, no - and I see this very bugreport as a reason to *enable* doctests: It seems evident to me that doctests can reveal flaws in packaging, upstream code or dependent code, and that it therefore is wrong in practice (despite a theoretic ideal) that they exist "solely [...] for upstream validating their code against the documentation published". Please do try to elaborate, if you suspect that I might be blind to something here. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
