On 11/13/25 5:20 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >>> if it is helpful: Debian follows the stable upstream releases (6.12.y >>> for trixie/Debian 13, right now 6.17.y for Debian unstable) and we try >>> to keep the patches limited which we apply on top. So far I see none >>> which touches net/sunrpc/. The patches applied: >>> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/tree/debian/6.17/forky/ >>> debian/patches?ref_type=heads >>> (in case this could help narrowing down more the issue). >>> >>> But we could try here additionally, if Tylor has the possibility to do >>> so, to try directly the 6.17.7 upstream version without Debian patches >>> applied. >> A bisect between broken v6.12.y and working v6.17.7 could identify >> what is possibly missing from v6.12.y. > There seems to be a missundestanding? 6.17.7 as present in Debian > unstable is neither working, at least Tyler said: > >> 2. Freshly installed Debian sid via mini ISO (2025-11-01). Same >> configuration as 1/above. > which includes a 6.17.y based kernel (6.17.7-1).
Got it. No, I grew up with Fedora. The Debian distribution names are somewhat lost on me. However, if you know there is a working kernel release sometime in the past, a bisect would be useful. Failing that, go ahead and try a stock linux-6.17.y kernel. But try building both the Fedora /boot/config and the Debian one. Could be we hit a Kconfig problem? -- Chuck Lever
