Re: James Addison > Even so: does this mean that we should be careful about disabling > fcf-protection=branch on a broader/default basis?
The question was entirely only about bookworm. In bookworm, none of the fcf-protection bits are enabled by default. It was solely active in sudo because upstream enabled it. I believe the question of disabling fcf-protection is not relevant for any other bookworm package. The "unstable" part of that question should be discussed on -devel, not in this bug. Christoph
