Hi Paul > Le Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Paul Gevers a écrit : > > > > PS: note that the migration failure of r-cran-av is one of the reasons > > why the ffmpeg transition isn't done yet.
Le Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 10:12:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > > I am really sorry for the trouble r-cran-av causes, but I do not have > the tools to see it happening. As of now the tracker page of the > package does not mention that it is involved in a transition. I looked at the ffmpeg tracker page and I see that it has the same version in unstable and it only mentions automatic transitions in which r-cran-av is not listed. Where can I track the nuisance of r-cran-av on transitions? > I tried to compute the reverse-dependency graph of r-cran-av but it > seems that there are circular dependencies between the package imports > (represented by Debian Depends) and the package regression tests > (represented by Debian Recommmends because we can not distinguish > between true Recommends and debian/test/control dependencies), is > is 10pm and I will not be able to open a RM bug today… I fixed the code to handle circular dependencies and computed that r-cran-av's dependency graph including Recommends is 819 R packages. https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/maintenance-utilities/-/blob/01f5485c6aff6ecfbf916859db451024fe1c228e/rdeps.R Interestingly no package directly depends on r-cran-av. If it is useful to file a RM bug on r-cran-av's removed architecture please let me know. Otherwise, we will have to wait because I think that the 819 other packages are not ready yet. At the moment I am still doing the architecture restrictions by hand on packages having new upstream releases. Once it is done, I will do it with automated source uploads on the other packages. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Nagahama, Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan Debian Med packaging team http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tooting from home https://framapiaf.org/@charles_plessy - You do not have my permission to use this email to train an AI -
