On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:11:37PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I think there's a bug report in the system on that already. If you're
> using aptitude with those settings and no problems, that would be a good
> data point in favor of jacking it up (changes to resolver settings have
> a nasty habit of spawning unintended consequences, so I've been pretty
> conservative about them, esp. since I haven't had much time for aptitude
> in the last few months).
I don't currently, but I could set it up one day and run it for a while. :-)
> Would you like a pipe-or-script-file-based interface to aptitude, btw?
That would be good, yes. :-) (Ideally a library-based interface, I guess, but
a script file would go a long long way.)
While we're at it, it's impossible to distinguish "install memtest86"
("memtest86+") from "do the default action to memtest86+" ("memtest86+") on
the command line. Thankfully, "memtest86++" is unambigious =)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
