Hello Paul, Adrian: On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 12:54 PM Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 12:40:11PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > >... > > On 2/7/26 23:09, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > > Thanks Emilio. Packages uploaded to the unstable. > > > > > > There seems to be regressions on riscv64 in several autopkgtest. Can you > > have a look: > > > > /usr/bin/riscv64-linux-gnu-ld.bfd: cannot find -lurdfdom_model_state: No > > such file or directory > > This isn't riscv64 specific, see for example > https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ros-kdl-parser/testing/amd64/68547339/ > > This is a variant of the usual issue that different so-versions of a > library should ideally conflict with each other, since mixing them > in a binary is in many cases not safe. > Thanks Adrian for providing context. Should I go ahead and declare a conflict in liburdfdom5 agains the liburdfdom4? Or do we prefer it to hable in a different way?
