Hi Andreas- Yes please, I'd appreciate it very much if you'd take care of migrating minimodem to suitable packaging and maintenance for its age. :) Your NMU will be much appreciated too. Thank you!
-Kamal On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 6:33 AM Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > Source: minimodem > Version: 0.24-1 > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-Cc: Package Salvaging Team <[email protected]> > > Hi Kamal, > > I realise that you are upstream and Debian maintainer of minimodem. > This is great and I'm happy you are dedicated to distribute your code > also trough Debian. In the past it has turned out that it makes sense > to maintain the Debian packaging separately from the upstream repository > for instance if upstream does not require much changes any more as it > seems to be the case given that there was no change in the last ten > years. The Debian packaging might be worth aligning to latest packaging > standards. Moreover Debian's vcswatch is a bit confused about commits > that are not really related to the Debian packaging. > > I would offer to migrate minimodem to the Debian team on Salsa and do a > NMU (or alternatively ping you once done for a regular maintainer upload > - whatever you prefer). > > What do you think? > > Kind regards > Andreas. > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: forky/sid > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), > (5, 'experimental'), (1, 'buildd-experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 6.17.13+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT) > Kernel taint flags: TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC > Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), > LANGUAGE=de_DE:de > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > LSM: AppArmor: enabled >
