Hello Santiago Am 09.05.26 um 17:37 schrieb Santiago Vila:
On Sat, May 09, 2026 at 02:33:51PM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:Package: base-files Version: 14 Severity: normal Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
There are some minor issues I'd like to clarify. For example: would it be ok if we use "AGPL-3.0" as the filename for the AGPL license? (the gnu site has "agpl-3.0.txt" but it would be weird to start using txt or lowercase now).
ACK, I renamed it and pushed the changes to salsa.
I think, a link isn't useful. The description of a license and its corresponding version should be as precise as possible.(If yes, would a symlink AGPL -> AGPL-3.0 still be useful/desirable?)
(Additionally, I will look for canonical URLs for those license, and will contact you if I don't find a good one for any of them).
Do you want the canonical URLs in the licenses texts themselves?Do you want the URL from the SPDX URL which I prefer or from the the original website like gnu.org?
Would you like this information to appear above or below the test?
Thanks.
Thanks for your review -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
