On 5/13/26 2:01 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 12 May 2026, John Collins wrote:
! /ID [<BAC5ECC86743A24DB489859FD6D0C0AF> <BAC5ECC86743A24DB489859FD6D0C0AF>]
I don't think this is the issue at hand.
This is known since **ages** and the reproducible build initiative
has developed tools to deal with that.
I agree completely. That also means that the posted example of
non-reproducibility was irrelevant; that example was my starting point, i.e.,
the files ref_man1.pdf and ref_man2.pdf
Sorry for the noise.
John
