On 14/05/26 01:38, Andrew Bower wrote:
I literally just tried the first one, the new command, along with a
pidof() emulation function in /lib/lsb/init-functions, as a transparent
solution for all existing initscripts and it appeared to work very well!
I see the MBF just went through so we can't refer to this approach in
guidance but I think we might have a good way through here with this
enhancement.
Hi Andrew,
the MBF did not include the packages that use pidof in initscripts. And
there is pretty much no overlap between packages using pidof in their
initscripts and at runtime, so it is still possible to do a mini-MBF
focused on replacing the direct use of pidof in initscripts.
Regards,
--
Gioele Barabucci
