Dear Gilles, thank you for the report and patch.
I have prepared stimfit 0.16.11-3 with your HDF5 2.x fix. The source package is uploaded to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/stimfit/ Would it be possible for you to sponsor this upload? Best, Christoph > On 10 Jun 2026, at 11:24, Gilles Filippini <[email protected]> wrote: > > Source: stimfit > Version: 0.16.11-2 > Severity: important > Tags: ftbfs patch > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi, > > During a test rebuild of HDF5's reverse dependencies against HDF5 2.1.0 > currently in experimental, stimfit FTBFS because its check on HDF5 > version doesn't expect a majot release number > 1. > > The attached patch fixes this issue and works with both HDF5 releases > 1.14.6 and 2.1.0. > > Best, > _g. > > > - -- System Information: > Debian Release: 12.0 > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-44-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT) > Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE > Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not > set > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > LSM: AppArmor: enabled > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEoJObzArDE05WtIyR7+hsbH/+z4MFAmopLSsACgkQ7+hsbH/+ > z4PmoggAkV7hRcKzhedaRxt4YQ5PRdTmz1SVfI6QMWOoOxDUzRvuW/ZbdGwH9qET > CgaX8w7FIJ5A55vX/VnSwLElExS41L+bwsYkutEC8wjE7GMxgWFQI3M+gg5WBo29 > hznQYup1GdKseUVl+aFqTO46ZbEc6LAEqbjt239IKpVZkWm2DgwBUkzHM6nfXdFk > 6/cE2tSFO6umzflkpG+NtAsbHyQ6hMFQPIPrbJ1ysBlywrFxblV47Ex+KPe6KfgH > Avw0Exp2+DEQ1vm5IVWghINcZn9Gxc8giVCTzK1TVyoUC1Cl3Lq8dLZEcogukWLh > lzRdrlCcb/JVgF9qerc8j+gCZZV/iA== > =c0wC > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > <stimfit.debdiff>
