On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 07:09:33AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Hi,
Hi, > Quoting Adrian Bunk (2026-06-11 06:59:53) > > Control: tags 1136404 + pending > > Control: tags 1137408 + patch > > Control: tags 1137408 + pending > > > > Dear maintainer, > > > > I've prepared an NMU for reform-setup-wizard (versioned as 1.0-14.2) and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. > > whoops, these two issues slipped out of my TODO list. Sorry for that! > > Thanks a lot for preparing the NMU. Since I'm on the LowThreshNMU list, you > could've uploaded without delay right from the start I try to avoid doing anything in my NMU workflow package/maintainer-specific, there is nothing bad about giving maintainers a few days to review my changes or even making a maintainer upload (which happens frequently). I've had some bad experiences with unhappy maintainers after 0-day NMUs, uploading to delayed avoids a lot of hassle for me. I've also mostly stopped submitting patches to the BTS, for less trivial fixes an upload to DELAYED/14 is my default way of sending the maintainer a patch - and avoids me having to touch the package again for an NMU later when there is no maintainer reaction. I'm sometimes uploading > 100 NMUs with RC bug fixes in a week, that's why I have my own workflows to minimize work and hassle for me. > and if you are in a rush, you can still do that. Thanks, done. > Thank you for your work and for your NMU! Please don't cancel it. :) > > cheers, josch cu Adrian
