Hi, Quoting Adrian Bunk (2026-06-11 08:52:22) > > > I've prepared an NMU for reform-setup-wizard (versioned as 1.0-14.2) and > > > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel > > > it. > > > > whoops, these two issues slipped out of my TODO list. Sorry for that! > > > > Thanks a lot for preparing the NMU. Since I'm on the LowThreshNMU list, you > > could've uploaded without delay right from the start > > I try to avoid doing anything in my NMU workflow package/maintainer-specific, > there is nothing bad about giving maintainers a few days to review my > changes or even making a maintainer upload (which happens frequently). > > I've had some bad experiences with unhappy maintainers after 0-day NMUs, > uploading to delayed avoids a lot of hassle for me. > > I've also mostly stopped submitting patches to the BTS, for less trivial > fixes an upload to DELAYED/14 is my default way of sending the maintainer > a patch - and avoids me having to touch the package again for an NMU > later when there is no maintainer reaction. > > I'm sometimes uploading > 100 NMUs with RC bug fixes in a week, > that's why I have my own workflows to minimize work and hassle for me.
that makes sene — thank you for your extensive explanation! And thank you for fixing bugs in my package. Much appreciated. :) cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
