On 2026-06-25 11:37, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
These sundials tests are confusing me.
https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/sundials/testing/amd64/72397287/
is testing the old (not rebuilt) version 7.1.1+dfsg1-12 of sundials
against the new petsc 3.25, so of course it fails.
https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/sundials/testing/amd64/72376730/
uses the new bin-NMU rebuilt version 7.1.1+dfsg1-12+b1
and so passes with the new petsc 3.25.
...
This other failure is probably of a similar nature, although the test
is quite succinct:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/d/dolfinx-mpc/72428997/log.gz
Since we in general don't want to add that kind of Breaks, because it
makes upgrades harder and is very unlikely that a system ends up in a
mixed state, I'll force the migration where needed. > It'd be good to
confirm that this last test (dolfinx-mpc) falls in that situation, and
perhaps make (in a future upload) the test more verbose. As for the
unreproducibility, since it's not a > regression, I'll ignore it for
now. A little progress on that front (e.g. a bug report somewhere
appropriate) would be welcome, since this will bite us again in the
next transition.
I think dolfinx-mpc is following the same logic. It's not showing red
in any of the tracker pages, mind, it already passed.
It passed tests with the new petsc 3.25 in
https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dolfinx-mpc/testing/amd64/71965048/
using the binNMU rebuilt dolfinx-mpc 0.10.5-1+b1.
Drew
