Hi Jochen, Am Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 06:20:20PM +0200 schrieb Jochen Sprickerhof: > I added debrebuild to salsa-ci and it is pretty close to what reproduce.d.n > does for testing migration but there are surely differences, do you have > something specific in mind?
Thank you for contacting me. You might like to compare the following logs: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fairy-stockfish/-/jobs/9891679 - passes and corresponds to 14.0.1.xq-0.2 where reproducible build failed https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fairy-stockfish/-/jobs/9899807 - passes and corresponds to 14.0.1.xq-0.3 where reproducible build failed The only change between the uploaded packages and the Salsa CI tests is that I did some `dch -r`. I pushed with `git push -o ci.skip` the final result to not uselessly stress our hardware. I'm not sure whether the logs of the uploaded 14.0.1.xq-0.2 and 14.0.1.xq-0.3 are kept somewhere or whether you can run diffoscope on the sources from snapshot.d.o. My workflow is to trust Salsa CI and upload if all tests are green and here we have two instances where this strategy did not worked. In general I have to admit that I'm not very educated about reproducibility and can't say much more than to point you to these observations. Hope this helps Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de
