Hi Jochen, Am Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 08:15:58PM +0200 schrieb Jochen Sprickerhof: > > In general I have to admit that I'm not very educated about > > reproducibility and can't say much more than to point you to > > these observations. > > Note that reproducibility is not a binary decision. A package can be > reproducible in one environment and not in an other one. For fairy-stockfish > your commits state that profiled optimization was the cause, thanks for > finding that btw. This most likely depends on the exact system the > compilation is done on. The salsa-ci runs you linked where all done on the > same runner so it makes sense that the profiling resulted in the same > optimization.
OK. > Contrary reproduce.d.n uses different hardware then the Debian > buildds. This is why I linked to the release team docs that state that > builds should not depend on hardware specifics. If this is the explanation for the issue I'm perfectly fine with this and I hope this will remain a very rare case. Thank you for all your work Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de
