> On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:36:37PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > Has this patch been tested?
>
> Oops, old code snuck in there; sorry about that.
>
> > You seem to be removing a file in the NFSROOT, I'd say you need to do rm -f
> > $FAI_ROOT/etc/...
>
> Yes, that sounds correct.
>
> The basic idea here is that {10,90}fai are options that are useful during
> initial package installations, but need to go away in the final system, no?
> Or is the original bug report simply bogus?
>AFAIK you are right, but at least the posted patch is bogus - is the uploaded version of the package fixed correctly? Despite all that, I think policy states that you should add a -0.0 instead of increasing the upstream version number. Regards, Michael
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
