On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:55:10PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > AFAIK you are right, but at least the posted patch is bogus - is the uploaded > version of the package fixed correctly?
No, the patch is the same as the one in the package. Should I perhaps upload a new one with the right variable in front? :-) > Despite all that, I think policy states that you should add a -0.0 instead of > increasing the upstream version number. There is no clear policy on NMU version numbers for native packages, unfortunately; "dch -n" does what I did, but I've also seen recommendations of "-0.1" (or "-0.0" as you suggest), but that would indicate a non-native package, which upsets debuild and others. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
