> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/release-notes/upgrading.en.html#adding-apt-internet-sources > is the official documentation for trixie. > >> Is >> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch02.en.html#_debian_archive_basics >> table 2.2 official documentation? > > No.
Take it from the perspective of an end user. You discover Debian, you are being told about Debian, you go to the website: Top header: Blog, Micronews, Planet, **Wiki** Follow along the page, u have 2 things that are easy to understand: Download and User Support. None of the pages point to OFFICIAL DOCUMENTATION. So, the user considers, as common in almost all internet, that either is the Wiki, or the link to subpages that have visible included MANUAL in it. Crawling all debian.org <http://debian.org/> website, there is nothing that would make somebody who is not being told directly by a Debian community member, that the RELEASE INFO is the official documentation. And a note, the release information never explained what are each of the repositories listed there for a blind copy paste. I’m very familiar with Debian, and with your explanation is clear to me: there is nothing for normal people to understand where is the official documentation. Information is very fragmented and opinionated on how things should work. It would be wonderful if facts would be more clear about what is what and what is official. Regards, Madalin
