Hm. I was trying to figure out why this gstreamer dependency is there because it doesn't make any sense that fwknop would need this. This is where it got introduced:
https://github.com/mrash/fwknop/pull/336 I have no idea why I added gstreamer in there. We should try just dropping that line first. Francois On 2026-09-08 at 06:28:40, intrigeri ([email protected]) wrote: > Package: fwknop-apparmor-profile > Version: 2.6.11-2 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > apparmor-profiles-extra will be removed shortly, so please embed your own copy > of the gstreamer AppArmor abstraction, which won't be part of Debian soon. > AFAIK there's no upstream project that caries that abstraction anymore. > > I suggest naming it abstractions/${BINARY_PACKAGE}-gstreamer. > > If necessary, I intend to raise this to RC and NMU no earlier than September > 22. > > Thank you! > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: forky/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (2, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 7.1.12+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT) > Kernel taint flags: TAINT_USER > Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), > LANGUAGE=en_IE:en_US:en:C > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > LSM: AppArmor: enabled > > Versions of packages fwknop-apparmor-profile depends on: > ii apparmor-profiles-extra 1.37 > pn fwknop-server <none> > > fwknop-apparmor-profile recommends no packages. > > fwknop-apparmor-profile suggests no packages.
