* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > severity 380698 normal > tag 380698 confirmed > merge 380698 336411 > thanks > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 02:11:40AM +0200, Peter Grzybowski <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Package: firefox > > Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.4-3 > > Severity: important > > > > > > the firefox that can be installed from the package tree, > > does not run the colorzilla extension, it seems that it is > > a problem with the libxpcom libs, the binary downloaded > > from the www.mozilla.com works fine. > > after overwritting the files in /usr/lib/firefox (or what ever > > $FIREFOXHOME you have) every thing works, so that is > > just a matter of packaging. that issue may lead to other > > problem and yet it may not. firefox can make your tiny life a > > lot easier when you are working on a web project by its extensions. > > hope this report helps. > > This is a known issue. See bug #336411.
Is #378667 also this issue? Gal G.A. is claiming that an official mozilla.org firefox built with gcc 4.1 doesn't have this issue. Could it have something to do with the way we're compiling it, flags, libs, etc? -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
