Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le dimanche 17 septembre 2006 à 17:28 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : >> Package: gnomeicu >> Version: 0.99.10-1 >> Severity: normal >> Tags: patch >> >> Sorry, the mail didn't get through... > >> Received: from luk by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.63) >> (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) >> id 1GOM0Q-0004lx-Nb >> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:17:54 +0200 >> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:17:54 +0200 > > That bug has been set RC yesterday, since when people are NMUing without > letting a day to maintainer to comment? That NMU is not welcome, could > you drop it?
Sorry, too late... The bug is 12 days old, not one day... If the package would have been binNMUable, there would have been no need to upload a source NMU in the first place. I don't know why you would object this NMU unless you want to keep libtasn1-2 in the archive or don't want gnomeicu in etch? Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
